U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Should we double-buffer by default?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Should we double-buffer by default? [message #4067 is a reply to message #4066]

Wed, 19 July 2006 11:01

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

OK, I have tested on my SisGX/Sempron1.8 notebook and while the difference is small, I must say there is difference...

Means back to development.... Now I am thinking about some sort of more simple approach to the old problem.... In fact, the real trouble of all this is "sibling Ctrl intersection". That makes all the trouble, if I want really correct algorithm. Anyway, at the same time it is not very often corner case.

So my next idea is to detect this problem and perform non-buffered draw just for ctrls that do not have this problem. Also, maybe we could detect and handle unbuffered just Ctrls that are "big" (say bigger that 200x200 pixels).

I will test these new ideas tommorow or on Friday.

As for GridCtrl scrolling problem, I think I know where to look and I think it is in CtrlDraw.cpp Smile

Smile

, but sample code would help, if possible..... (upload to ftp, please).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Tue, 18 July 2006 15:23
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Tue, 18 July 2006 15:31
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Tue, 18 July 2006 15:56
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Tue, 18 July 2006 16:36
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Tue, 18 July 2006 23:43
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Tue, 18 July 2006 23:57
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 00:42
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Wed, 19 July 2006 08:09
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Wed, 19 July 2006 08:34
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 09:01
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Wed, 19 July 2006 10:09
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 11:01
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Wed, 19 July 2006 11:18
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 11:47
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: unodgs on Wed, 19 July 2006 16:25
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 16:43
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: fudadmin on Wed, 19 July 2006 17:59
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 18:56
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: fudadmin on Wed, 19 July 2006 19:23
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Wed, 19 July 2006 21:14
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: fudadmin on Fri, 21 July 2006 04:52
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Fri, 21 July 2006 10:44
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mirek on Fri, 21 July 2006 12:10
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: fudadmin on Wed, 19 July 2006 19:38
		Re: Should we double-buffer by default? By: mr_ped on Wed, 19 July 2006 15:04

Previous Topic:	let's discuss new Draw principles and problems...
Next Topic:	A list of SQL dialects to support (eventually)..

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Jun 09 01:45:58 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04165 seconds