U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ MT-multithreading and servers » [SOLVED] Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) [message #42208 is a reply to message #42186]

Thu, 27 February 2014 19:25

Oblivion
Messages: 1223
Registered: August 2007

Senior Contributor

Hello,

If I add the below declaration to both heap.cpp and heaputil.cpp (since heap is declared externally in heapimp.h), MT apps succesfully compile.

thread__ Heap heap;

But this time the linker fails because of mulitple definitions.

Regards.

Github page: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz
Bobcat the terminal emulator: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/Bobcat

[Updated on: Thu, 27 February 2014 22:06]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[SOLVED] Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) By: Oblivion on Thu, 27 February 2014 01:42
		Re: Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) By: mdelfede on Thu, 27 February 2014 10:16
		Re: Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) By: Oblivion on Thu, 27 February 2014 15:20
		Re: Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) By: Oblivion on Thu, 27 February 2014 19:25
		Re: Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) By: Oblivion on Thu, 27 February 2014 22:06
		[SOLVED] Re: Unable to compile MT applications (weird assembler error with GCC on Linux i386 arch) By: Oblivion on Sun, 02 March 2014 01:44

Previous Topic:	Problem using TcpSockets
Next Topic:	SSL handshake error

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Aug 09 11:48:30 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03688 seconds