Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Win32 install: going .msi  () 1 Vote
Re: Win32 install: going .msi [message #44425 is a reply to message #44412] Tue, 10 March 2015 19:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
chickenk is currently offline  chickenk
Messages: 171
Registered: May 2007
Location: Grenoble, France
Experienced Member
Yes! I tried WiX some years ago and I was quite happy with the toolchain. It helps describing an installation in a formal manner and in a declarative way. At that time, I created some bash scripts using xmlstarlet utility to generate the xml, and the harvest tool to gather the source files, in an attempt to create a WiX-based installer for the EFL (the libraries from the Enlightenment project).

So I'd say, definitely go for it! And Upp XML manipulation libraries will be a great help to generate the declarative installation xml files.

Lionel
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Bazaar package quality parameter
Next Topic: Interesting: with GTK backend, strtod does not work (correctly)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Aug 12 21:59:44 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08381 seconds