U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » Draw, Display, Images, Bitmaps, Icons » Native DPI

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Native DPI [message #45020 is a reply to message #45018]

Wed, 19 August 2015 13:07

Tom1
Messages: 1303
Registered: March 2007

Ultimate Contributor

Hi,

Thanks! The directory selector works as expected now.

Additionally, up-scaled icons surely look sharper too.

I wonder if it would be possible to use 256x256 icons for all purposes now? I tried to set icon for my TopWindow (using Icon()), but the downscaling does not work as expected. It feels like there is no antialias filtering present before down sampling. If the downscaling algorithm is under U++ control, could it be changed to use some antialias/low-pass filtering algorithm to give better results?

One slightly unrelated question: Why has the flag parameter FD_ZERO for FormatDoubleFix() changed to FD_ZEROS some time since the last release?

Best regards,

Tom

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Native DPI By: Tom1 on Thu, 21 May 2015 11:45
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sat, 23 May 2015 20:23
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Sun, 24 May 2015 10:29
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sun, 24 May 2015 21:16
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 25 May 2015 10:05
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 25 May 2015 16:54
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Mon, 25 May 2015 23:13
		Re: Native DPI By: chickenk on Tue, 26 May 2015 07:35
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Tue, 26 May 2015 10:22
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Wed, 27 May 2015 10:03
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Wed, 27 May 2015 10:14
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Wed, 27 May 2015 13:32
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Wed, 27 May 2015 14:13
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Thu, 28 May 2015 09:47
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Fri, 29 May 2015 10:16
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Fri, 29 May 2015 13:27
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Fri, 29 May 2015 17:23
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sat, 06 June 2015 07:37
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 08 June 2015 10:31
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sat, 13 June 2015 17:04
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 15 June 2015 00:00
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Mon, 15 June 2015 14:01
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Tue, 16 June 2015 22:13
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Tue, 16 June 2015 23:37
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Wed, 17 June 2015 10:02
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Fri, 19 June 2015 08:26
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 22 June 2015 11:52
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Fri, 26 June 2015 09:13
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Mon, 03 August 2015 20:11
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Wed, 05 August 2015 13:03
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Wed, 05 August 2015 14:56
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Wed, 05 August 2015 15:50
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sun, 09 August 2015 13:22
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 10 August 2015 11:12
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Thu, 13 August 2015 12:22
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Tue, 18 August 2015 20:10
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Wed, 19 August 2015 13:07
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Wed, 19 August 2015 22:35
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Sat, 22 August 2015 09:56
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sun, 23 August 2015 12:23
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Sat, 29 August 2015 13:54
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sat, 29 August 2015 18:26
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 31 August 2015 10:24
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 31 August 2015 14:38
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Wed, 02 September 2015 16:11
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Thu, 03 September 2015 09:07
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Fri, 04 September 2015 08:51
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Fri, 04 September 2015 10:10
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sun, 06 September 2015 07:35
		Re: Native DPI By: Tom1 on Mon, 07 September 2015 10:55
		Re: Native DPI By: mirek on Sun, 04 October 2015 08:07

Previous Topic:	Layout size
Next Topic:	Mismatched icon sizes

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 09 20:26:24 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02597 seconds