Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ TheIDE » U++ TheIDE: Compiling, Linking, Debugging of your packages » Project questions...
Re: Project questions... [message #452 is a reply to message #451] Wed, 04 January 2006 05:30 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
fudadmin is currently offline  fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator
ChrisSE wrote on Tue, 03 January 2006 18:06

1. Where can I set preprocessor symbols?

2. Where can I set libraries to link with?

3. Is there a clear way to CLOSE the current package? I also find it frustrating that there is no File -> New option.

4. Are there templates available for creating a Win32 DLL or static library? DevC++ has a really nice interface for creating new projects. I wish Ultimate++ had this interface.

Thanks,
Chris


AFAIK,

1,2 Options for compiler, linker etc. you can set in
"Package Organizer"
accessing:
a)submenu from Project or
b) the 2'nd icon to the right from "Build mode" drop list.
then
after selecting your required files set your flags/options

For examples explore different existing packages.

3. If you start to work with a new existing package ("Set Main Package" from "File" menu), Ultimate++ removes the previous package from its "compiling scope".
And you can close all the files

except one active (I usually select one from a newly opened package to close the rest)

with Ctrl-Shift-U (or "Close all file tabs" from "File" menu)

My tip: I open several instances of Ultimate++ if I need samples (to use Ultimate++ as file viewer).

regarding New (File). At the begining it was unusual for me too...
But after some time I even forgot about it. In Ultimate++ you need less files in your projects and you can use other already existing packages as ready "bricks". I'd say it teaches more block-structural thinking than tree-of-files-and-classes. It's a bit unusual to change some programming habits.
But in the nearest future, I expect, the interface becomes even much more better. Smile

4. About templates I expect the other guys can tell more...

Just one remark that, IMHO, Code::Blocks has much better interface than Dev++.



[Updated on: Wed, 04 January 2006 07:56]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Compile Error with Upp 705 Dev1
Next Topic: App dosn't start anymore
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 04 00:13:34 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04218 seconds