U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Considering different approach to Win32 release

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release [message #45376 is a reply to message #45156]

Mon, 02 November 2015 18:10

mdelfede is currently offline

mdelfede
Messages: 1307
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

mhhhhh... I don't remember all the work done, but IIRC at least up to MSC9 the linker fixups were not an issue.... or I never stumbled on them, and I have quite big functions encrypted in my app, which of course access other functions too.
Probably up to MSC9 the compiler/linker insert relative addressing and do not need fixups, ant that changed from version 10 upwards, I don't know.

Anyways, fixing such an issue is not trivial at all, if even possible.
The encrypter now do its job on executable on disk and the decrypter does it in memory when the fixups are (wrongly) applied, so there's no simple solution other than rethink the whole stuff.
Or, better said, a possible solution would be to leave fixups unencrypted, but then we'd need a table somewhere to tell decrypter to leave them alone. Not an easy task either, and would entail the complete PE header analysis.

Anyways, the package doesn't work either on 64 bit M$ compilers, which do not support online assembly.

So, I guess for now the package will stay as it is.... I'm using it on my app, and I'll stay with MSC9 too, for now, or for linux compilers which up to now behaves good with it.
For a more "professional" solution I'd need monthes to code it, and have no time now Wink

Wink

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 19:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Sun, 20 September 2015 20:31
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Didier on Sun, 20 September 2015 21:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 23:36
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Mon, 21 September 2015 07:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: timsky on Mon, 21 September 2015 15:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: koldo on Mon, 21 September 2015 16:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 21 October 2015 20:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 09:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 12:23
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:00
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:25
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Wed, 28 October 2015 08:06
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 10:53
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:32
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 19:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:43
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:42
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:04
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:46
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 18:18
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 20:16
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Fri, 30 October 2015 10:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 12:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 14:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:05
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:29
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:55
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Mon, 02 November 2015 18:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 11:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 25 November 2015 13:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:52
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Thu, 26 November 2015 09:35

Previous Topic:	mingw/gdb troubles
Next Topic:	Ideas on U++ as library

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Wed May 29 12:39:17 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02220 seconds