Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Second CodeProject article
Re: Second CodeProject article [message #45851 is a reply to message #45849] Wed, 13 January 2016 13:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
cbpporter wrote on Wed, 13 January 2016 11:26
Those benchmarks are really impressive and hard to beat. Great job!

Not sure that raw performance will help us convert a lot of new people over to U++ in this day and age, but it is good to have.

PS: I'm interested on how the benchmark looks with long strings (512+ characters) in the vector? Especially in the std one. Did they switch their implementation over to move internal elements?


Seriously, std::sort vs Sort with long strings is not as clear win (if I remember well, about 2x).

Anyway, both GCC and MSC now has moving std::string, but it is till much slower than plain nice memcpy... Smile (I am speaking about e.g. Vector::Insert here).
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: U++ on ohloh.com
Next Topic: Third CodeProject article
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Aug 24 02:42:28 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03945 seconds