Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #46713 is a reply to message #46705] |
Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36   |
mr_ped
Messages: 826 Registered: November 2005 Location: Czech Republic - Praha
|
Experienced Contributor |
|
|
I don't even see, how you can have problem with C++11 source.
If your own source is C++03 only, so set your compiler to build upp with C++11 (14), and your code with C++03, and link it. But you should migrate to C++11 like yesterday, it's so much better.
edit: about increased productivity
For me certainly C++14 helps a lot. "auto" and "constexpr" I use daily. Unified {} initializers syntax helps me a lot, so I don't have to remember all the special quirky ways how to initialize some things to value. Things like "for (auto i : {0, 1, 2})" *reads* good to me. I don't use lambdas much, can't get used to their syntax yet. But just the basic stuff plus official move semantics were enough for me to switch right away in 2011, now it's 5 years later and basically every decent platform has full C++11 compiler, and almost complete C++14 one.
[Updated on: Sun, 17 July 2016 12:42] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
 |
|
What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Novo on Sat, 16 July 2016 17:04
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:37
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Thu, 21 July 2016 07:22
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: kov_serg on Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Fri, 02 September 2016 09:24
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 September 2016 09:04
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Wed, 17 August 2016 10:09
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:29
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:34
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 02 22:54:11 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02860 seconds
|