Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #46713 is a reply to message #46705] Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mr_ped is currently offline  mr_ped
Messages: 826
Registered: November 2005
Location: Czech Republic - Praha
Experienced Contributor
I don't even see, how you can have problem with C++11 source.

If your own source is C++03 only, so set your compiler to build upp with C++11 (14), and your code with C++03, and link it. But you should migrate to C++11 like yesterday, it's so much better.

edit: about increased productivity
For me certainly C++14 helps a lot. "auto" and "constexpr" I use daily. Unified {} initializers syntax helps me a lot, so I don't have to remember all the special quirky ways how to initialize some things to value. Things like "for (auto i : {0, 1, 2})" *reads* good to me. I don't use lambdas much, can't get used to their syntax yet. But just the basic stuff plus official move semantics were enough for me to switch right away in 2011, now it's 5 years later and basically every decent platform has full C++11 compiler, and almost complete C++14 one.

[Updated on: Sun, 17 July 2016 12:42]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Use zlib inside another library
Next Topic: U++ in a computer cluster
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jun 02 22:54:11 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02860 seconds