mirek wrote on Fri, 03 April 2020 16:59

Is this Makefile ok for you? I mean, shoudl I continue working on it than commit the change after test on BSD and Linux?

I want to be able to ./install U++ (actualy, maybe instead of ./install, the better name is ./config). Actually, at this point, even if I am persuaded by community to drop it, I will probably keep maintaining it for myself.

What you are trying to do is formally correct, but it is just a new slightly improved iteration of current tarball.

Instead of trying that, I think it would be better to invest time to provide binary packages (again). For tarball, simple Makefile with readme is enough. I plan to start autogenerating Makefile to repo really soon.

Oh, and BTW, pkg-config is not enough to identify missing packages, fresh fedora does not even have 'make' installed.