U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? [message #53596 is a reply to message #53595]

Tue, 14 April 2020 13:38

mirek
Messages: 14263
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

I have fixed the poll to make it more clear...

Still, I think that there is no reason to sacrifice compatibility. The differences in what is possible without sacrificing it and what is possible while doing so are IMO negligible.

EDIT: Actually, the only meaningfull difference there is that you insist that 3rd non-option parameter is "output", while backward compatibility requires "build method" (which you want to supply with -b only). Is that really worth it?

Mirek

[Updated on: Tue, 14 April 2020 13:42]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: amrein on Tue, 14 April 2020 13:15
		Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: mirek on Tue, 14 April 2020 13:38
		Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: amrein on Tue, 14 April 2020 15:12
		Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: mirek on Tue, 14 April 2020 15:32
		Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: dolik.rce on Tue, 14 April 2020 13:55
		Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: mirek on Tue, 14 April 2020 17:19
		Re: [POLL] Should we upgrade umk command line behavior ? By: amrein on Tue, 14 April 2020 18:09

Previous Topic:	Things we want from Linux/FreeBSD release archives
Next Topic:	Anybody willing to look into OpenSSL Win32 compilation?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Jul 02 14:24:24 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04175 seconds