Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » get_i
Re: get_i [message #54256 is a reply to message #54254] Tue, 16 June 2020 21:20 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14256
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Novo wrote on Tue, 16 June 2020 18:21
Another experiment/suggestion.
I rewrote get_i using variadic template:
template <typename A, typename... T>
constexpr A get_i(int i, const A& p0, const T& ...args)
{
	A list[] = {p0, args...};
	int n = sizeof...(args);
	return list[clamp(i, 0, n)];
}

const char* cr = get_i(1, "zero", "one", "two");
RDUMP(cr);
int ir = get_i(1, 0, 1, 2);
RDUMP(ir);

IMHO, my implementation is much shorter and it will compile faster.
IMHO, macroses __List and __Expand are not needed anymore ...


Yes, you are right about this, I have used old tricks mostly out of habit. I guess I will have to rewrite it all now Smile

However, constexpr I still do not agree. Following your logic, we should add constexpr to every single function everywhere - these are as likely to have constant parameters as get_i (which has like 0.00000001% chance that first parameter will be const in real code).
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ide: Assist parsing now parallel and some of it background
Next Topic: 2020.1 officially released
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Apr 30 01:08:41 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01204 seconds