Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » get_i
Re: get_i [message #54260 is a reply to message #54256] Tue, 16 June 2020 22:15 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Novo is currently offline  Novo
Messages: 1363
Registered: December 2006
Ultimate Contributor
mirek wrote on Tue, 16 June 2020 15:20

However, constexpr I still do not agree. Following your logic, we should add constexpr to every single function everywhere - these are as likely to have constant parameters as get_i (which has like 0.00000001% chance that first parameter will be const in real code).

You cannot add constexpr to every single function everywhere. There are restrictions ...
But, IMHO, function, which can be compiled with constexpr, should have it ...
At this time you are not using functions in compile-time context because you just cannot do that.

I personally often write code like this:
enum e {
  e01 = 1,
  e02 = 100,
  e03 = e01 + e02
};

In case of constexpr functions I'll be able to write this:
enum e {
  e01 = min(something, something_else),
  e02 = max(something, something_else)
};

Another observation: template functions/methods are inline by default.


Regards,
Novo
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ide: Assist parsing now parallel and some of it background
Next Topic: 2020.1 officially released
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 09 21:30:18 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01407 seconds