U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » Newbie corner » error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc()

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() [message #54646 is a reply to message #54645]

Tue, 25 August 2020 07:29

koldo
Messages: 3437
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

The ASSIMP case is a good example of U++ efficiency (thanks to Mirek Smile

).
The same ASSIMP example compiled with MSC without USEMALLOC is much faster than with USEMALLOC.
Now it would be great to get CLANG working without USEMALLOC.

Best regards
Iñaki

[Updated on: Tue, 25 August 2020 07:31]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: Xemuth on Sat, 22 August 2020 18:19
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: koldo on Mon, 24 August 2020 10:49
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: mirek on Mon, 24 August 2020 11:00
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: koldo on Mon, 24 August 2020 12:03
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: Xemuth on Mon, 24 August 2020 16:44
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: mirek on Mon, 24 August 2020 16:58
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: Xemuth on Mon, 24 August 2020 18:17
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: mirek on Mon, 24 August 2020 22:14
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: koldo on Tue, 25 August 2020 07:29
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: mirek on Tue, 25 August 2020 09:40
		Re: error: duplicate symbol: std::__throw_bad_alloc() By: koldo on Tue, 25 August 2020 09:42

Previous Topic:	Building applications
Next Topic:	Custom build configuration per package

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Jul 19 04:21:27 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04737 seconds