U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Re: Some bazaar packages ported to UppHub [message #59386 is a reply to message #59380]

Mon, 19 December 2022 21:26

Klugier
Messages: 1077
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków

Senior Contributor

Hello Massimo,

Quote:

Feel free to link in official UppHub list the ones you want... I still think that it should be possible to add MORE UppHub URLs inside theide, as I pointed in a previous post, so everybody could provide its own list of Hub packages to add, without having to replace the official list.
I even tested links inside json package list, they don't work.

I agree that it would be cool to have the possibility to add additional lists to the official one. I have this on my radar, however we can not do everything at once Smile

Currently there is a possibility to override official list with the custom one via "More.." -> "Set UppHub URL..". Did you try this option? If yes and if it doesn't work make sure that .json is formatted similar to our official nests.json file. This option should works with remote and local files. Screenshot with configuration window below:
index.php?t=getfile&id=6729&private=0

Quote:

Some are been already ported by somebody (Uniq, PolyXML, Cypher...) and some not (Serial, Protect, RasterCtri...).

In case of your packages. We ported them, because we were not sure you are still interested in contributing to U++. I think we should migrate to yours package version for our official nests.json. Could you give me all packages that are already in UppHub, but belongs to you and are available on https://gitlab.veneto.com/upphub?page=1. I will replace links.

Please use always U++ as a name of our framework. Ultimate++ is deprecated. So, in description "Ultimate++ (www.ultimatepp.org) UppHub packages" should be replaced with "U++ (ultimatepp.org) UppHub packages".

Moreover, did you consider different name for your group on GitLab? UppHub seems like official repository/registry and in this case it is not. This group is dedicated to your packages. For example Inaki has Anboto organization, maybe you can have something similar like MaxPackagesForUpp, MaxPackages, MaxUppPackages, MPackages, PowerPackages, PowerUppPackages, etc.. It is up to you what you will choose, but UppHub as a group name should be avoided in this case.

Klugier

Attachment: Zrzut ekranu_20221219_210338.png
(Size: 98.74KB, Downloaded 180 times)

U++ - one framework to rule them all.

[Updated on: Mon, 19 December 2022 21:29]

Report message to a moderator