Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » 2024rc1
Re: 2024rc1 [message #61035 is a reply to message #61034] Mon, 21 October 2024 13:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Lance is currently offline  Lance
Messages: 656
Registered: March 2007
Contributor
I take back the hint about code size and efficiency difference. But personally I would use if constexpr () in this and similar cases.

Quote:

For optimization purposes, modern compilers will generally treat non-constexpr if-statements that have constexpr conditionals as if they were constexpr-if-statements. However, they are not required to do so.

A compiler that encounters a non-constexpr if-statement with a constexpr conditional may issue a warning advising you to use if constexpr instead. This will ensure that compile-time evaluation will occur (even if optimizations are disabled).
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Win32 openssl updated to 3.2.1 version
Next Topic: SetRect "MegaRect" support...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 08 17:09:51 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05141 seconds