U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Tue, 19 December 2006 23:36

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Balage wrote on Tue, 19 December 2006 16:36

That would be a good thing.

Generating the .obj directly? Why? The linux solution (if the externs are used correctly) works just as good on windows.

Because we can? Smile

Well, Tom's COFF library is in anyway (because of .dlls), so using it for this was natural things to do at the time.

Mirek

		Linux .brc handling bug By: zsolt on Fri, 10 November 2006 14:13
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: mirek on Sat, 11 November 2006 13:42
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: zsolt on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:02
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: zsolt on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:36
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: zsolt on Tue, 19 December 2006 14:13
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: Balage on Tue, 19 December 2006 15:37
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: zsolt on Tue, 19 December 2006 18:41
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: Balage on Tue, 19 December 2006 19:23
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: zsolt on Tue, 19 December 2006 20:56
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: mirek on Tue, 19 December 2006 21:26
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: Balage on Tue, 19 December 2006 22:36
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: mirek on Tue, 19 December 2006 23:36
		Re: Linux .brc handling bug By: Balage on Wed, 20 December 2006 00:06

Previous Topic:	Compile problem in Gentoo-AMD64
Next Topic:	Can't Seem to See Console Output While In the Debugger

Goto Forum:

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Aug 10 07:15:41 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03424 seconds