Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1
Re: Linux Makefile(s) [message #8770 is a reply to message #8765] |
Thu, 29 March 2007 17:53   |
ebojd
Messages: 225 Registered: January 2007 Location: USA
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
luzr wrote on Thu, 29 March 2007 10:38 |
Special version of U++? Why?
Well, one thing is perhaps relevant - U++ development was for quite a long time "bussines app driven" - U++ was simply extended to satisfy demands of our customers.
Also, sometimes we refactor interface. Usually, this means fixing all applications, and yes, it is a bit annoying, but that is the price of perfection (and hopefuly, this will not happen too much in future).
BTW, "uppsrc" has more packages than you see in normal release. Many of them are "backward compatibility", some of them experimental or supporting some specific application (or simply not stable and refined enough).
Mirek
|
When I ran into the problem of my code compiling libraries from ~/upp/uppsrc/* instead of the new ones in /usr/share/upp/uppsrc/* I got to thinking about why having a seperate copy would be necessary or useful. The most obvious would be for long term application maintenance, by bundling the library code. I had not realized (when I first ran u++) what the implications of having a copy of uppsrc, etc., made to ~/upp/. After thinking about it a little while I realized that library versions could be managed similar to how portage deals with multiple versions of libraries using slots, and they can be compiled against specific revisions of the source...
Hmmm... I just realized that this discussion is in releasing u++ and not in the coffee corner where I intended to keep it. How does one move a discussion to a different forum?
Anyway, thanks for the great work, the discussion, and putting up with my ramblings whilst I learn the system.
EBo --
|
|
|
 |
|
Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1
By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 12:04
|
 |
|
Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1
By: ebojd on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:12
|
 |
|
Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1
By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1
By: unodgs on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1
By: mirek on Tue, 13 March 2007 15:00
|
 |
|
Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:08
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:44
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: guido on Tue, 20 March 2007 15:44
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Wed, 21 March 2007 20:31
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: guido on Thu, 22 March 2007 00:54
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 12:29
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:12
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:20
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:48
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Fri, 23 March 2007 16:41
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: Novo on Sat, 24 March 2007 00:44
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Sat, 24 March 2007 17:05
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: unodgs on Sat, 24 March 2007 18:48
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 14:48
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Wed, 28 March 2007 21:10
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 22:48
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: unodgs on Thu, 29 March 2007 08:41
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:31
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:51
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 16:01
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:38
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:53
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: ebojd on Mon, 26 March 2007 03:32
|
 |
|
Re: Linux Makefile(s)
By: mirek on Fri, 23 March 2007 11:33
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Aug 03 02:00:52 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07454 seconds
|