U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » C2280

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

C2280 [message #47586]

Thu, 02 February 2017 12:49

NilaT
Messages: 70
Registered: November 2011
Location: Austria

Member

Hello everyone,

I have another, very urgent question.
I want to compile my project with 2015 sources and MSC15...
Some errors here, some warnings there, not worth be mentioned.
But, one error is very annoying and I can't get rid of it.
It's C2280...

test.cpp (191): error C2280: "Upp::Array<TEST> &Upp::Array<TEST>::operator =(const Upp::Array<TEST> &)" : Es wurde versucht, auf eine gelöschte Funktion zu verweisen

I already found this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31264984/c-compiler-error -c2280-attempting-to-reference-a-deleted-function-in-visual

which says the Array class needs a "= default" constructor and copy constructor or something.
I tried a few things but nothing worked.

Please help.
Very urgent!
Any help appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

PS: Please help me with my other Problem (RPC_METHOD) as well, thank you.
PPS: My exact version of Upp is 10249

//edit: When I change

void operator=(Array&& v)          { if(this != &v) { Free(); vector = pick(v.vector); } }

Array& operator=(const Array&) = default;

in Vcont.h, the error won't occur but I don't think this is the right solution...

And then the same error occurs for Upp::XmlNode...
Very annoying...

[Updated on: Thu, 02 February 2017 13:01]

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47592 is a reply to message #47586]

Fri, 03 February 2017 11:11

NilaT
Messages: 70
Registered: November 2011
Location: Austria

Member

Please?

Attachment: Unbenannt.png
(Size: 14.39KB, Downloaded 363 times)

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47593 is a reply to message #47592]

Fri, 03 February 2017 11:55

cbpporter
Messages: 1427
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

I Google translated that error to "An attempt was made to refer to a deleted function".

It is not the U++ Array you need to add the = default to, but the class you are using.

It is hard to fix this without seeing the code and if your class is copyable or not, but try something from:

http://www.ultimatepp.org/srcdoc$Core$pick_$en-us.html

rval_default(Foo)

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47595 is a reply to message #47586]

Sat, 04 February 2017 01:29

NilaT
Messages: 70
Registered: November 2011
Location: Austria

Member

Hello and thanks for your reply.

But it MUST be the U++ Array, as my variables are Array<String> and Array of a own structure.
Even the U++ ArrayMap and XmlNode have this issue.

I can post you some code tomorrow if you want, but I guarantee it won't help here.

Any other suggestions?
I will try the rval_default part tomorrow though

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47600 is a reply to message #47595]

Sat, 04 February 2017 21:16

Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.

Experienced Contributor

Most of time this error means you need to write
b = pick(a);
or
b = clone(a);
instead of
b = a;

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47602 is a reply to message #47586]

Sun, 05 February 2017 13:50

NilaT
Messages: 70
Registered: November 2011
Location: Austria

Member

Thanks Mindtraveller, this seems to do the job.
May you can explain WHY?

Thanks Wink

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47606 is a reply to message #47602]

Mon, 06 February 2017 13:15

Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.

Experienced Contributor

http://www.ultimatepp.org/srcdoc$Core$pick_$en-us.html

U++ style of coding insists on explicit definition what you want to do: to clone object or to move it. You mustn't write trivial code like
b = a;
fot U++ objects because it is hard to say whether you want to clone object or pick/move it from a to b.

P.S. It is rather uncommon for C++, but I do personally like this style. It is more strict and less error prone.

[Updated on: Mon, 06 February 2017 13:16]

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47609 is a reply to message #47586]

Mon, 06 February 2017 16:31

NilaT
Messages: 70
Registered: November 2011
Location: Austria

Member

Thank you, seems clear to me.
This must be something C++11 invented, right?
Because we use 2010 sources as well and there was no need for that.
Now, as we updated to 2015, it must be explicit defined...

Well, however, thank you for your help.

Report message to a moderator

Re: C2280 [message #47619 is a reply to message #47609]

Thu, 09 February 2017 20:29

Didier
Messages: 725
Registered: November 2008
Location: France

Contributor

Hi,

In fact, the origin of the error is probably readable in the code
==> you may have something like the following:

xxxx operator=(xxxx i) = deleted;

Apparently (I haven't looked precisely) deleted indicates that the code is deprecated but can't be used anymore (it is still present to make it easier to do corrections: if you know what has been removed).

I ran into the same type of error 2 days ago, and all the 'xx operator(const xx t)' where marked deleted ==> notice that only the CONST ones where deleted.
From my point of view these modifications are linked to the management of the move semantics introduced in C++11

[Updated on: Thu, 09 February 2017 20:30]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	RPC_METHOD how to "define"
Next Topic:	ASSERT when using ValueMap

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 25 12:12:03 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00590 seconds