captainc Messages: 278 Registered: December 2006 Location: New Jersey, USA
Experienced Member
Mirek, have you tested the C++ parser on the standard library or other external libraries? I'm curious to know how it compares to something like Visual Studio's Intellisense.
This thought occurred to me because there are a few Boost libraries where it would be great to have auto-completion. For example I will be working with graphs and the Boost::Graph library is very good and widely used; there is no Upp equivalent without writing a Upp graph implementation (which would be a cool project, but I can't do that right now).
Mirek, have you tested the C++ parser on the standard library or other external libraries?
Back then, yes. The problem is that there is a lot of macros in std::. Therefore I have postoned the further development until I have macros working...
Which will not be solved elegantly (i.e. theIDE way). Cheers!!!
Boost has GIL which is cool to use as I do a lot of Computer Vision development (mainly with OpenCV/mingw on Win32).