U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » UppHub » Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56226]

Thu, 11 February 2021 19:52

Klugier
Messages: 1083
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków

Senior Contributor

Hello Koldon,

I just noticed that Mirek to speed up the development of UppHub move some or your crucial packages into ultimatepp organization. Sometimes ago, we agree that only core packages should be placed there. So, in the long term it should be move under personal umbrella. Could you move these packages in your spare time and create PR with updated link to UppHub repository.

index.php?t=getfile&id=6373&private=0

Klugier

Attachment: UppGitHub.png
(Size: 41.45KB, Downloaded 478 times)

U++ - one framework to rule them all.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56227 is a reply to message #56226]

Thu, 11 February 2021 20:50

mirek
Messages: 14058
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Note: No need to create PR, maintainers of list will be happy to fix that for you. But moving them, eventually (no pressure) might be good.

Or not, we can discuss this. I have to say I am not sure what is the best approach in this case...

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56234 is a reply to message #56226]

Fri, 12 February 2021 12:03

koldo
Messages: 3394
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

Klugier wrote on Thu, 11 February 2021 19:52

Hello Koldon,

I just noticed that Mirek to speed up the development of UppHub move some or your crucial packages into ultimatepp organization. Sometimes ago, we agree that only core packages should be placed there. So, in the long term it should be move under personal umbrella. Could you move these packages in your spare time and create PR with updated link to UppHub repository.

Klugier

Hi Klugier.

You should address this to Mirek, not to me.

Best regards
Iñaki

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56235 is a reply to message #56234]

Fri, 12 February 2021 14:26

mirek
Messages: 14058
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

koldo wrote on Fri, 12 February 2021 12:03

Klugier wrote on Thu, 11 February 2021 19:52
Hello Koldon,

I just noticed that Mirek to speed up the development of UppHub move some or your crucial packages into ultimatepp organization. Sometimes ago, we agree that only core packages should be placed there. So, in the long term it should be move under personal umbrella. Could you move these packages in your spare time and create PR with updated link to UppHub repository.

Klugier

Hi Klugier.

You should address this to Mirek, not to me.

Well, it is not that easy: I cannot create repository under you personal account in github.

But you CAN move the modules I have created to your personal account (there is web interface in github to do so) if we/you decide it is desirable.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56238 is a reply to message #56235]

Fri, 12 February 2021 18:30

koldo
Messages: 3394
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

mirek wrote on Fri, 12 February 2021 14:26

koldo wrote on Fri, 12 February 2021 12:03
Klugier wrote on Thu, 11 February 2021 19:52
Hello Koldon,

I just noticed that Mirek to speed up the development of UppHub move some or your crucial packages into ultimatepp organization. Sometimes ago, we agree that only core packages should be placed there. So, in the long term it should be move under personal umbrella. Could you move these packages in your spare time and create PR with updated link to UppHub repository.

Klugier

Hi Klugier.

You should address this to Mirek, not to me.

Well, it is not that easy: I cannot create repository under you personal account in github.

But you CAN move the modules I have created to your personal account (there is web interface in github to do so) if we/you decide it is desirable.

Mirek

It is not appropriate to use capital letters to tell me to do something that you told me two days ago you were going to do for me.

Best regards
Iñaki

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56239 is a reply to message #56238]

Fri, 12 February 2021 20:32

Klugier
Messages: 1083
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków

Senior Contributor

Hello Koldo,

Let's speak on Skype. I send invitation to you Smile

The whole movement process to UppHub is relatively easy (under personal account). I think Mirek had good intentions to do the move. As far as I understand we would like to cut off whole bazaar soon. I think it is no longer present in the nightly builds, so UppHub is the only option.

I would like to tell that you shouldn't commit to bazaar packages like Control4U and Function4U anymore. This is leading in two concurrent repositories.

Klugier

U++ - one framework to rule them all.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56262 is a reply to message #56239]

Mon, 15 February 2021 08:15

koldo
Messages: 3394
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

Actually we are receiving reports of Bazaar packages failing.
Please take the actions without breaking actual code.

Best regards
Iñaki

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56264 is a reply to message #56262]

Mon, 15 February 2021 08:26

mirek
Messages: 14058
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

koldo wrote on Mon, 15 February 2021 08:15

Actually we are receiving reports of Bazaar packages failing.
Please take the actions without breaking actual code.

can you be more specific please? do you mean originally bazaar packages downloaded through upphub?

are reports in this forum or who is reporting?

mirek

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56286 is a reply to message #56264]

Wed, 17 February 2021 09:41

BioBytes
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2008
Location: France

Senior Member

Quote:

can you be more specific please? do you mean originally bazaar packages downloaded through upphub?

are reports in this forum or who is reporting?

mirek

Hi all,
I have reported that Control4U downloaded from uppHub does no longer contain PolyXml.h file and therefore breaks my old code.

See https:// www.ultimatepp.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=11403&s tart=0&

Koldo suggested to get the svn version of Control4U to solve my problem

Thank you for advice
Biobytes

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56287 is a reply to message #56286]

Wed, 17 February 2021 11:04

Klugier
Messages: 1083
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków

Senior Contributor

Hello BioBytes,

Consider all Koldo's package right now as unstable. We are working on movement them to separate organization called Libraries4U. I think the whole process will start on the upcoming weekend. After that each separate package should be available as UppHub entity.

Right now, if you would like to use nightly (unstable) build you should use svn version of bazaar. It is still there. You could also back to stable release that contains bazzar. However, Koldo's hot fixes are not present.

I would like to sorry for this transition period, but it must happened.

Klugier

U++ - one framework to rule them all.

[Updated on: Wed, 17 February 2021 11:10]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56291 is a reply to message #56287]

Wed, 17 February 2021 20:25

BioBytes
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2008
Location: France

Senior Member

Quote:

Right now, if you would like to use nightly (unstable) build you should use svn version of bazaar. It is still there.

Hello Klugier,
.
Many thanks for explanation about Bazaar packages. I think the good way is to wait for the updating of uppHub next week. Just a question about the svn source, may I get it directly from github or is there something else to do ? Confused

Regards
Biobytes

[Updated on: Wed, 17 February 2021 21:07]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Non core packages shouldn't be under ultimatepp umbrella organization on GitHub [message #56296 is a reply to message #56291]

Thu, 18 February 2021 13:58

mirek
Messages: 14058
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

BioBytes wrote on Wed, 17 February 2021 20:25

Quote:

Right now, if you would like to use nightly (unstable) build you should use svn version of bazaar. It is still there.

Hello Klugier,
.
Many thanks for explanation about Bazaar packages. I think the good way is to wait for the updating of uppHub next week. Just a question about the svn source, may I get it directly from github or is there something else to do ?

Regards
Biobytes

Libraries4U should be now available through UppHub.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	SurfaceCtrl, 3D viewer of Multiple file format and Surface class
Next Topic:	Bazaar svn now read-only

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Oct 08 02:01:54 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02029 seconds