Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » upp-portage
upp-portage [message #8501] Wed, 14 March 2007 15:27 Go to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13986
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Ebojd, I think upp-portage should be placed with releases, not in special category.

Mirek
Re: upp-portage [message #8504 is a reply to message #8501] Wed, 14 March 2007 15:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ebojd is currently offline  ebojd
Messages: 225
Registered: January 2007
Location: USA
Experienced Member
luzr wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 09:27

Ebojd, I think upp-portage should be placed with releases, not in special category.



If I understand your statement, that was a mistake. I changed the upp-portage package release to be 2007.1rc3. Is this what you were referring to, or do I need to rename the package?

Thanks for catching the upp-portage release thing. It should be changed now.

EBo --
Re: upp-portage [message #8505 is a reply to message #8504] Wed, 14 March 2007 16:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13986
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
No, sorry, what I wanted to say is that I believe that file should be called like

upp-portage-2007.1rc3.zip

and be placed in 2007.1rc3 group.

There should be no "upp-portage" group.

Mirek
Re: upp-portage [message #8510 is a reply to message #8505] Wed, 14 March 2007 18:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ebojd is currently offline  ebojd
Messages: 225
Registered: January 2007
Location: USA
Experienced Member
luzr wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:41

No, sorry, what I wanted to say is that I believe that file should be called like

upp-portage-2007.1rc3.zip

and be placed in 2007.1rc3 group.

There should be no "upp-portage" group.

Mirek


Ah... OK. How about I name it using the gentoo conventions (which are very similar to UPP's). This would make it upp-portage-2007.1_beta1.zip. The only problem here is the versioning between upp and upp-portage might confuse a couple of people, but would likely be the best.

I tried to hide/remove the package and had problems... I'll have to take another look at it tonight after work.

EBo --
Re: upp-portage [message #8513 is a reply to message #8510] Wed, 14 March 2007 21:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13986
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
ebojd wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 13:09

luzr wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:41

No, sorry, what I wanted to say is that I believe that file should be called like

upp-portage-2007.1rc3.zip

and be placed in 2007.1rc3 group.

There should be no "upp-portage" group.

Mirek


Ah... OK. How about I name it using the gentoo conventions (which are very similar to UPP's). This would make it upp-portage-2007.1_beta1.zip. The only problem here is the versioning between upp and upp-portage might confuse a couple of people, but would likely be the best.

I tried to hide/remove the package and had problems... I'll have to take another look at it tonight after work.

EBo --



Well, we had beta1 before... My undestanding is that beta is version before "gold" release, supposed to be changed. "rc" is file that, if succesful, is just renamed (by deleting "rc" part) and then is final.

Anyway, the nameing convention of portage file is not that important IMHO. But it logically belongs to the group, no need to create a special group...

Mirek
Re: upp-portage [message #8514 is a reply to message #8510] Wed, 14 March 2007 22:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ebojd is currently offline  ebojd
Messages: 225
Registered: January 2007
Location: USA
Experienced Member
ebojd wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 12:09

luzr wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 10:41

No, sorry, what I wanted to say is that I believe that file should be called like

upp-portage-2007.1rc3.zip

and be placed in 2007.1rc3 group.

There should be no "upp-portage" group.

Mirek


Ah... OK. How about I name it using the gentoo conventions (which are very similar to UPP's). This would make it upp-portage-2007.1_beta1.zip. The only problem here is the versioning between upp and upp-portage might confuse a couple of people, but would likely be the best.

I tried to hide/remove the package and had problems... I'll have to take another look at it tonight after work.

EBo --



Ok... should be done now.

EBo --

Re: upp-portage [message #8515 is a reply to message #8513] Wed, 14 March 2007 22:04 Go to previous message
ebojd is currently offline  ebojd
Messages: 225
Registered: January 2007
Location: USA
Experienced Member
luzr wrote on Wed, 14 March 2007 15:52


Anyway, the nameing convention of portage file is not that important IMHO. But it logically belongs to the group, no need to create a special group...



Agreed. I got SF's use of package and group mixed up. With any luck this fixed it, and with any luck will not happen again...

Thanks again Wink

EBo --
Next Topic: list of uppsrc to be release
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jun 22 20:06:08 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01606 seconds