Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » SSE2 and SVO optimization (Painter, memcpy....)
Re: BufferPainter::Clear() optimization [message #53985 is a reply to message #53984] Tue, 19 May 2020 13:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tom1
Messages: 1212
Registered: March 2007
Senior Contributor
[quote title=mirek wrote on Tue, 19 May 2020 13:45]Tom1 wrote on Tue, 19 May 2020 12:35
mirek wrote on Tue, 19 May 2020 10:49

I really like the w++ incremental pointer logic over the Set4(pointer+offset). This approach seems to give a small improvement on my system.


Compiler actually converts that to offsets anyway... (I have checked disassembly).

Quote:

But seriously, we need to put an end to this madness! The bang for the buck is rapidly decreasing as working hours are increasing... Smile


Smile Well, you have started it Smile

Mirek

Laughing I admit to it! My fault... Smile

Anyway, pick you choice: 7a or 3T2, but note that MSBT19 (32bit I mean) likes 3T2 better on short transfers. CLANG, CLANGx64 and MSBT19x64 are happy with both. (But, please do your own benchmarks, as this is just my repeated scan through different lengths with the pitfall you pointed out earlier.)

Best regards,

Tom
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Should we still care about big-endian CPUs?
Next Topic: TheIDE crash after switching package
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon May 06 00:38:49 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03142 seconds