U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #54657 is a reply to message #54653]

Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59

Oblivion is currently offline

Oblivion
Messages: 1094
Registered: August 2007

Senior Contributor

Hello Mirek,

Thank you for your help and patience.

Before I finalize the Turtle port, I need a clarification on one point:

The original Turtle package uses "all-static" approach.

1) Is it OK to keep the VirtualGui-based Turtle all-static too (It works well...), or should I remove the static stuff and make them instance members?
2) Accordingly, can I instantiate more than one VirtualGui/TurtleGui in the same process. Does U++ properly support this?
if so, this might prove useful for later iterations of the Turtle package.

Best regards,
Oblivion

Github page: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz
upp-components: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/upp-components
Bobcat the terminal emulator: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/Bobcat

[Updated on: Fri, 28 August 2020 15:00]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		[Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 14 July 2020 18:55
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 28 July 2020 17:42
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 30 July 2020 20:51
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 31 July 2020 10:37
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 31 July 2020 16:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 26 August 2020 17:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 27 August 2020 10:35
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 16:57
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:52
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 17:56
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 18:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 20:22
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 18:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 06:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 07:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 09:03
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:33
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:38
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 19 January 2021 17:09
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 10:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 13:40
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:30

Previous Topic:	Want to use CLANG with MSBT64 toolchain
Next Topic:	UppHub and version managment

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 15:37:50 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02800 seconds