Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #54658 is a reply to message #54657] Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Oblivion wrote on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
Hello Mirek,

Thank you for your help and patience.

Before I finalize the Turtle port, I need a clarification on one point:

The original Turtle package uses "all-static" approach.

1) Is it OK to keep the VirtualGui-based Turtle all-static too (It works well...), or should I remove the static stuff and make them instance members?
2) Accordingly, can I instantiate more than one VirtualGui/TurtleGui in the same process. Does U++ properly support this?
if so, this might prove useful for later iterations of the Turtle package.

Best regards,
Oblivion


Well, it is still using CtrlCore and CtrlCore has a lot of global variables, so it does not really make sense to bother making Turtle support more than single session per process....
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Want to use CLANG with MSBT64 toolchain
Next Topic: UppHub and version managment
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 11:33:08 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03446 seconds