|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #54681 is a reply to message #54658] |
Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34 |
Oblivion
Messages: 1093 Registered: August 2007
|
Senior Contributor |
|
|
Hello Mirek,
The Turtle package is ported to VirtualGui, and it is now in the trunk. This was the first phase. The next is to improve the server.
However, there are some small issues that might need fixing in the U++ Core, before 2020.2.
1) LaunchWebBrowser() is not working with Turtle ATM, as it uses a compile time switch (TURTLE). I could have added support for it but it had to use TURTLE switch and IMO, LaunchWebBrowser should be handled globally for VirtualGui, not just for Turtle. Otther possible/future virtualization software might want to utilize it too. (Making a callback-based version of LaunchWebBrowser for VirtualGui platform, maybe?)
2) Accordingly the TURTLE switches and Turtle specific functionality in the uppsrc seems obsolete now. VIRTUALGUI switches are sufficient. We'll already have feature-parity with the previous version of Turtle package once the LaunchWebBrowser issue is solved.
3) As it happens, I saw a Ctrl::IsEndSession() method defined in CtrlCore (always returns false). I think this method is a better way to check for session termination, at least in VirtualGui/Turtle. So I was wondering if it is possible to define it in VirtualGui/Ctrl, and let it return the status of fbEndSession flag? The reason why I ask is, it can be used to break loops that lie outside the scope of Ctrl::ProcessEvent(), in case of session termination. (i.e. Turtle's SyncClient() method is one of them...)
Best regards,
Oblivion
Github page: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz
upp-components: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/upp-components
Bobcat the terminal emulator: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/Bobcat
[Updated on: Mon, 31 August 2020 22:03] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
[Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 28 July 2020 17:42
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:15
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Fri, 31 July 2020 10:37
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Wed, 26 August 2020 17:12
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Thu, 27 August 2020 10:35
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 16:57
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:16
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:12
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:48
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:52
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 17:56
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 18:00
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 20:22
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 18:41
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 06:48
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 07:15
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 09:03
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:33
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:38
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 19 January 2021 17:09
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 10:15
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 13:40
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:30
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 10:50:28 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02253 seconds
|
|
|