|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #55937 is a reply to message #55935] |
Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39 |
Oblivion
Messages: 1093 Registered: August 2007
|
Senior Contributor |
|
|
Hello Mirek,
Quote:While trying to move Turtle to UppHub, I have noticed it does not work Smile (I will gladly provide you commit rights there as soon as I find out your github username...)
The reason seems to be that after uploading html, we try to establish WebSocket connection over the same port. Unfortunately, at the same time browser tries to fetch favicon, which gets cought by WebSocket and connection is terminated because that is not the correct websocket request.
Have you noticed this issue?
Trying to remedy that by moving websocket communication to another port...
Thanks for reporting this. I haven't encountered this issue. I'll look into it tonight but I am already working on a simple login mechanism, and the Turtle server side is going to change soon.
Stil, IMO it would be better to use a randomized port number for websocket in ephemeral port range or > 32K.
Speaking of login: the mainstream browsers do not allow/deprecated unsecure websocket connections unless the host is localhost or explicitly allowd. In any case using unsecure layer is bad practice. And the K.I.S.S way of implementing a login mechanism is to use the secure web socket layer (wss/TLS). (I'll propose the plan next week)
But at the moment WebSocket class seems to allow server side security via its older interface. Is there a way or plan to fix that or can I safely use the older API?
my github username: ismail-yilmaz
Best regards,
Oblivion
Github page: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz
upp-components: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/upp-components
Bobcat the terminal emulator: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/Bobcat
[Updated on: Tue, 05 January 2021 12:15] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
[Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 28 July 2020 17:42
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:15
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Fri, 31 July 2020 10:37
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Wed, 26 August 2020 17:12
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Thu, 27 August 2020 10:35
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 16:57
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:16
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:12
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:48
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:52
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 17:56
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 18:00
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 20:22
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 18:41
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 06:48
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 07:15
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 09:03
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:33
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:38
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Novo on Tue, 19 January 2021 17:09
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 10:15
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 13:40
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16
|
|
|
Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package
By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:30
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 16:42:51 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02767 seconds
|
|
|