U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #55964 is a reply to message #55963]

Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16

Oblivion is currently offline

Oblivion
Messages: 1093
Registered: August 2007

Senior Contributor

Hello Mirek,
Quote:

are you sure you want to go there wrt login? I mean, originally I planned that login mechanism will be left to be implemented by client in some web langauge (or Skylark).

The thing is I didn't know the original design decisions and the prospect for the Turtle package, until now. Smile

Smile

So I assumed that it is expected to be implemented. This is actually a good news and a reasonable approach.

I have no objections to less work on my side. Very Happy

Very Happy

Thus what I'd like to do now is document the simple wire protocol and add a better description to README.

As a side note: I already implemented a proof-of-concept Turtle-protocol based VirtualGui/SshGui (as ssh2 sub-system, usingo our SSH package) that effectively solves the security/login problem for U++ remote frontend.
And implemented a simple TurtleCtrl prototype that works with both html/ws and this ssh2 backends.

Best regards,
Oblivion

Github page: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz
upp-components: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/upp-components
Bobcat the terminal emulator: https://github.com/ismail-yilmaz/Bobcat

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		[Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 14 July 2020 18:55
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 28 July 2020 17:42
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 30 July 2020 20:51
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 31 July 2020 10:37
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 31 July 2020 16:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 26 August 2020 17:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 27 August 2020 10:35
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 16:57
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:52
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 17:56
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 18:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 20:22
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 18:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 06:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 07:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 09:03
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:33
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:38
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 19 January 2021 17:09
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 10:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 13:40
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:30

Previous Topic:	Want to use CLANG with MSBT64 toolchain
Next Topic:	UppHub and version managment

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Apr 29 14:24:19 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03045 seconds