U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #55993 is a reply to message #55948]

Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28

Novo is currently offline

Novo
Messages: 1358
Registered: December 2006

Ultimate Contributor

mirek wrote on Tue, 05 January 2021 14:22

Novo wrote on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
mirek wrote on Tue, 05 January 2021 12:00

Speaking of which: It would be great if your automated building infrastructure started scanning UppHub. Do you think it would be possible?

Theoretically, yes.
What do I need to do for that?

Preliminary: Start here:

https://github.com/ultimatepp/ultimatepp/blob/master/upphub. root

then scan through all lists, clone/pull nests, compile (or even test).

I will create some docs about the listings json format soon...

Initial version works.
I can read json file from internet, retrieve repo url, scan for *.upp files, and build them.
Unfortunately, the very first error I get with the package Urr is

undefined reference to `main'

I can read more settings from the json file, like to build a package or not, supported platforms and compilers.
In my own current configuration I manually support lists of packages for each platform. That includes U++.

Regards,
Novo

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		[Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 14 July 2020 18:55
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 28 July 2020 17:42
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 30 July 2020 20:51
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 31 July 2020 10:37
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 31 July 2020 16:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 26 August 2020 17:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 27 August 2020 10:35
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 16:57
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:52
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 17:56
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 18:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 20:22
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 18:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 06:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 07:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 09:03
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:33
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:38
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 19 January 2021 17:09
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 10:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 13:40
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:30

Previous Topic:	Want to use CLANG with MSBT64 toolchain
Next Topic:	UppHub and version managment

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Apr 29 15:10:39 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04434 seconds