U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package [message #56052 is a reply to message #56004]

Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Novo wrote on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14

It would be great to add code below to packages Turtle and Skylark:
#ifdef flagMAIN
CONSOLE_APP_MAIN {
}
#endif
That would allow me to build repos Turtle and Skylark fully automatically.

TIA

Is this a good idea?

I mean I understand you cannot compile without it, but in that case maybe you should just ignore non-main packages - compiling examples should do.

Or alternatively, you can detect non-main package and simply generate a project with empty CONSOLE_APP_MAIN and using the package you are testing.

Last alternative is to put something like above to the Core.

Putting it to every single package out there seems ugly.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 14 July 2020 18:55
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 28 July 2020 17:42
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Wed, 29 July 2020 11:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 30 July 2020 20:51
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 31 July 2020 10:37
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 31 July 2020 16:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Wed, 26 August 2020 17:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 27 August 2020 10:35
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 14:59
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Fri, 28 August 2020 15:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Fri, 28 August 2020 16:57
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Mon, 31 August 2020 21:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 11:39
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:12
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 16:52
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 05 January 2021 17:56
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 18:00
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 05 January 2021 19:05
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 05 January 2021 20:22
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 05:28
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Sun, 10 January 2021 18:41
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 03:14
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 06:48
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 07:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Tue, 12 January 2021 09:03
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:33
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 12 January 2021 20:38
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Tue, 19 January 2021 09:34
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Novo on Tue, 19 January 2021 17:09
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 10:15
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 13:40
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: Oblivion on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:16
		Re: [Proposal] The maintainer and the future of TURTLE package By: mirek on Thu, 07 January 2021 15:30

Previous Topic:	Want to use CLANG with MSBT64 toolchain
Next Topic:	UppHub and version managment

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Apr 29 11:38:56 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03307 seconds