Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw)
Re: WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) [message #57110 is a reply to message #57106] Wed, 26 May 2021 08:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13976
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Didier wrote on Tue, 25 May 2021 19:06
Hello Mirek,

I don't master all these caracter support problems but one thing that comes to my mind when I read you're proposition is:


  • With 300 000 graphemes in a table ==> you get 1.2 MB of used RAM : no problem
  • With 4 000 000 000 graphemes in a table ==> you get 12 GB of used RAM : this will be a problem before you run out of virtual characters


But I may misunderstand what you propose


Yes, I guess you are right. Bad idea after all.

Means we will need something like GString, where individual characters are (potentially) represented as String...

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Using BLITZ in release mode CLANG
Next Topic: Using Pen with U++
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 11 15:57:35 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02659 seconds