U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » 2022(?).2 beta

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: 2022(?).2 beta [message #59343 is a reply to message #59326]

Sun, 18 December 2022 05:07

Lance is currently offline

Lance
Messages: 527
Registered: March 2007

Contributor

Hi Mirek:

I understand that U++ currently aims to be compliant with c++14. Overall, U++ is very close to c++20 compliant.

IIRC, the only kind of complaints gcc/clang make when building TheIDE with std=c++20 is about caputuring `this` by default is deprecated in c++20 for a lambda. I am not sure if changing affected code to get rid of all such warnings will affect c++14 compliance but it's easy to make both worlds(or maybe all 3 worlds if we want to refer to c++17 and c++20 separately) happy anyways.

With MSVC, it is a different story. It complains in many cases like

    return some_condition ? SomeString : "Some ASCIIZ String";

These, though tedious, are easy to fix. I am no language lawyer, cannot tell which of MSVC and GCC/CLANG is/are correct here. But MSVC changes its behaviour from accepting it in C++14 to rejecting it in C++17 and beyond may tell something. Anyway it's not hard to make all worlds happy by just a little bit more keystrokes.

There are some more errors when compiling TheIDE with MSVC (mine is MSBT 2019 I believe) and std set to C++20. Another one is caused by Upp::Moveable::AssertMovealbe0 or something like that.

I mainly use CLANG now but I feel more assured if my code compiles fine on Ubuntu with GCC & CLANG, and on Windows with MS c++ compiler. I don't know if other users think this kind of check has some value, but it likely will be welcomed if a user can use u++ with more recent standard if he/she wishes(so that he/she can embrace utilities like constexpr-if and concept), and with the compiler he/she choose (one of the 3 major), while the bulk of U++ is in c++14 and be backward compatible.

Correction and some detailed error message:
1. The MSVC I used is MSBT22x64
2. The error message with AssertMoveable0 is like
Quote:

C:\upp\uppsrc\Core\Topt.h (157): error C2100: illegal indirection
C:\upp\uppsrc\Core\Topt.h (172): note: see reference to function template instantiation 'void Upp::AssertMoveable0<T>(T *)' being compiled
with
[
T=double
]ChWin32.cpp

BR,
Lance

[Updated on: Sun, 18 December 2022 05:59]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sat, 03 December 2022 15:47
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Novo on Sun, 04 December 2022 17:48
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mr_ped on Thu, 08 December 2022 00:54
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Fri, 09 December 2022 09:56
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Tom1 on Sat, 10 December 2022 19:17
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sat, 10 December 2022 23:39
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Tom1 on Sun, 11 December 2022 19:03
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 11 December 2022 19:45
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sun, 11 December 2022 20:02
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 11 December 2022 21:13
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sun, 11 December 2022 22:54
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Klugier on Sun, 11 December 2022 23:08
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 12 December 2022 00:47
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 12 December 2022 10:44
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Tue, 13 December 2022 03:19
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 12 December 2022 00:52
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 12 December 2022 22:18
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Tue, 13 December 2022 03:21
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Tom1 on Tue, 13 December 2022 10:25
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 10:45
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Tom1 on Tue, 13 December 2022 10:56
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 11:08
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Tom1 on Tue, 13 December 2022 11:42
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 11:57
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 11:58
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 13:21
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Tom1 on Tue, 13 December 2022 13:30
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 14:40
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mdelfede on Sun, 18 December 2022 23:03
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 23:14
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Klugier on Sun, 18 December 2022 23:35
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 19 December 2022 00:46
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Mon, 12 December 2022 12:42
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 12 December 2022 12:59
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Mon, 12 December 2022 13:24
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 12 December 2022 22:17
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Tue, 13 December 2022 17:33
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Tue, 13 December 2022 17:39
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 17:49
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Tue, 13 December 2022 18:17
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 18:32
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Tue, 13 December 2022 19:01
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Tue, 13 December 2022 19:12
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Tue, 13 December 2022 20:01
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Wed, 14 December 2022 14:05
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 05:07
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sun, 18 December 2022 13:26
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 14:48
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Klugier on Sun, 18 December 2022 15:41
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 18:50
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sun, 18 December 2022 19:55
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 20:08
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Klugier on Sun, 18 December 2022 21:54
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Sun, 18 December 2022 22:33
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 22:55
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Sun, 18 December 2022 23:29
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 19 December 2022 00:41
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 19 December 2022 10:08
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 19 December 2022 18:43
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 19 December 2022 19:10
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 19 December 2022 20:22
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 19 December 2022 23:14
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 19 December 2022 23:35
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Mon, 19 December 2022 23:54
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Novo on Tue, 20 December 2022 00:19
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Tue, 20 December 2022 00:48
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Novo on Mon, 19 December 2022 05:36
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 19 December 2022 00:15
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: Lance on Sun, 18 December 2022 22:35
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 19 December 2022 00:18
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: zsolt on Sun, 18 December 2022 16:08
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: pvictor on Wed, 14 December 2022 12:56
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Wed, 14 December 2022 14:04
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mr_ped on Sun, 18 December 2022 19:46
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Sun, 18 December 2022 19:53
		Re: 2022(?).2 beta By: mirek on Mon, 19 December 2022 12:20

Previous Topic:	New Assist features
Next Topic:	2022.3rc3

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Tue May 14 06:35:58 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01700 seconds