Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Extra libraries, Code snippets, applications etc. » OS Problems etc., Win32, POSIX, MacOS, FreeBSD, X11 etc » Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux?
Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? [message #8231] Thu, 22 February 2007 12:48 Go to previous message
mikisha is currently offline  mikisha
Messages: 2
Registered: February 2007
Junior Member
Hi All,
Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? I have checked that today only a few distros are packaged with glibc-2.4, for instance Ubuntu Edge. I would like to give U++ a try on Linux. I have been using Debian Etch for a long time but Etch lacks of glibc-2.4 and it has glibc-2.3.6 instead. I am satisfied with it and I do not want now to change it for Ubuntu Edge only for giving U++ a try.
So my question is: Is it possible somehow to run U++ on Linux distro with glibc-2.3? Of course I know I could run Ubuntu Edge from live dvd without installing (of course, I have to get it first) but I would like to run it on my Debian Etch.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: some drawing problems in X11
Next Topic: Building with LSB-SDK
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Oct 27 11:17:10 CET 2020

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01116 seconds