U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 [message #8464 is a reply to message #8461]

Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19

unodgs is currently offline

unodgs
Messages: 1366
Registered: November 2005
Location: Poland

Ultimate Contributor

Quote:

I guess we have bad metology for major releases.

I think the *major* release should start with Bas releasing src version (+ linux packages), because Bas can fix the Makefile. Daniel then should download this "src" and prepare Win32 releases based on it to keep consistency.
Other maintainers could add theirs versions later.

Well, win32 release is our MAIN release. That's why I'm preparing src file for Bas. Consistency is kept - but in opposite way. We could change it but 1) I don't see a good reason now (what that would change?) 2) Bas and I have our own tools to make packages optimized for proper input - uvs in my tool and zip file in Bas. Changing this would require time and tests.

In my opinion all maintainters should get sources directly from uvs. "Final" release should be tagged and all mainainers should sync those tagged sources. I only don't know if that is possible in current uvs. If not adding it is worth considering.

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 12:04
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: ebojd on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:12
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: unodgs on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Tue, 13 March 2007 15:00
		Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:08
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: guido on Tue, 20 March 2007 15:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 21 March 2007 20:31
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: guido on Thu, 22 March 2007 00:54
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: fallingdutch on Thu, 22 March 2007 09:34
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 12:29
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:12
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: fallingdutch on Thu, 22 March 2007 15:02
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:20
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Fri, 23 March 2007 16:41
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Sat, 24 March 2007 00:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Sat, 24 March 2007 17:05
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: unodgs on Sat, 24 March 2007 18:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 14:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Wed, 28 March 2007 21:10
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 22:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: unodgs on Thu, 29 March 2007 08:41
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:31
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:51
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 16:01
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:38
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:53
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Mon, 26 March 2007 03:32
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Fri, 23 March 2007 11:33

Previous Topic:	GCC.bm problems
Next Topic:	OK, time to release.... (finally).

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Tue May 07 22:48:15 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02571 seconds