U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Linux Makefile(s) [message #8765 is a reply to message #8762]

Thu, 29 March 2007 17:38

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

ebojd wrote on Thu, 29 March 2007 10:01

How do you deal with user side applications which require specific versions of u++ source?

Special version of U++? Why?

Well, one thing is perhaps relevant - U++ development was for quite a long time "bussines app driven" - U++ was simply extended to satisfy demands of our customers.

Also, sometimes we refactor interface. Usually, this means fixing all applications, and yes, it is a bit annoying, but that is the price of perfection (and hopefuly, this will not happen too much in future).

BTW, "uppsrc" has more packages than you see in normal release. Many of them are "backward compatibility", some of them experimental or supporting some specific application (or simply not stable and refined enough).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 12:04
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: ebojd on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:12
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: unodgs on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Tue, 13 March 2007 15:00
		Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:08
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: guido on Tue, 20 March 2007 15:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 21 March 2007 20:31
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: guido on Thu, 22 March 2007 00:54
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: fallingdutch on Thu, 22 March 2007 09:34
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 12:29
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:12
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: fallingdutch on Thu, 22 March 2007 15:02
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:20
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Fri, 23 March 2007 16:41
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Sat, 24 March 2007 00:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Sat, 24 March 2007 17:05
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: unodgs on Sat, 24 March 2007 18:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 14:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Wed, 28 March 2007 21:10
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 22:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: unodgs on Thu, 29 March 2007 08:41
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:31
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:51
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 16:01
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:38
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:53
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Mon, 26 March 2007 03:32
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Fri, 23 March 2007 11:33

Previous Topic:	GCC.bm problems
Next Topic:	OK, time to release.... (finally).

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue May 07 20:21:47 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01442 seconds