Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » Coffee corner » make U++ more elegant
Re: make U++ more elegant [message #9295 is a reply to message #9291] Wed, 25 April 2007 22:53 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Novo is currently offline  Novo
Messages: 1358
Registered: December 2006
Ultimate Contributor
luzr wrote on Wed, 25 April 2007 16:07


AFAIK, intrusive containers are faster / more effective in certain specific scenarios than STL. But that does not make it match U++ Core. In fact, from what I have read, intrusive containers mostly deal with node based elements, however the sole idea of node based containers is faulty. Continuous storage wins.



OK. You convinced me Smile Actually, I've already read a book, which explains a similar technique. Unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to apply it yet.

Quote:


BTW, U++ Core and NTL relation: In fact, U++ Core was first. NTL was just failed attempt to take a part of U++ Core and make it a library of it own. It was our first attempt to make some code public... Smile

Mirek



As far as NTL is that much better, it worth submitting to Boost. In this case you'll get unlimited advertising for free Wink

I think Boost worth using it. For example you could use Boost.Spirit to parse upp config files instead of manual processing them. Formal parsers let you discover interesting things like one below.

library
	,
	,
	,
	,
	;


I found it in GridCtrl.upp


Regards,
Novo
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: MS Win-XP device drivers, U++, and MinGW
Next Topic: Gourmet coffee gift baskets
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 12 05:06:19 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02618 seconds