Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » updating portage tree, questions, etc.
Re: updating portage tree, questions, etc. [message #17658 is a reply to message #17656] Mon, 25 August 2008 00:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13980
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
ebojd wrote on Sun, 24 August 2008 16:21


I do not think that it is that much different than what I was thinking. If the tool does not have any gui requirements then the question I was asking is how can we build *just that tool* the first time without an entire U++ system installed or someone else generating its Makefiles.



I am afraid that someone else has to generate the Makefile in any case. OTOH, this process can easily be automated (in nightly build).

Quote:


I'm curious though why you think the X11 libs must being present on the system when building umk?



You got it wrong... With X11 we already have 'umk' (it is just called 'theide').

The real goal, with 'umk', is to get rid of X11.

Quote:


When do you think the beta version of umk will be available?



Realistically, OTOH, there is not that high pressure right now.
Most things can be achieved with current 'theide' as commandline tool.

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Ultimate make (umk)
Next Topic: Unified locking?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 15 07:44:27 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02014 seconds