U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Has "file index" any fans?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Has "file index" any fans? [message #18617 is a reply to message #18615]

Sun, 12 October 2008 10:55

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 13976
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

chickenk wrote on Sun, 12 October 2008 03:26

In my opinion, here are 2 functionalities in File Index that would be good to find in the new browser (which is really, really great by the way):

1. Shortcuts to set the focus on the "search in scope" and "search type or header" fields, like F12 was set for File index search. Furthermore, I just noticed while trying that if the File index pane is closed, pressing F12 does not make it appear and set the focus. That would be a really pleasant behaviour, and for the browser as well of course.

BTW, I have added third field, "Find", that searches across all scopes. The shortcut key was planned to go there...

Quote:

2. In the file index, when the focus is on the search field,the behaviour is nice: I can navigate within results with up and down arrows, and press Enter to let the code editor go to the symbol definition. That is not the case (yet) in the browser pane, and that would be really nice. I found myself adding new lines instead of going to the symbol, because I was addicted and used to using this functionality from File index.

The only problem of this is that we have now two lists to deal with (scope + items in the scope).

Well, maybe the right solution is to add "<current file>" to the scope, then stay there for F12?

Any further ideas are welcome.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Sun, 12 October 2008 01:26
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: chickenk on Sun, 12 October 2008 09:26
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Sun, 12 October 2008 10:55
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Sun, 12 October 2008 15:48
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Sun, 12 October 2008 15:51
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Sun, 12 October 2008 20:00
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Sun, 12 October 2008 21:15
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Sun, 12 October 2008 22:56
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Sat, 25 October 2008 22:02
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Sun, 26 October 2008 07:53
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Tue, 28 October 2008 01:15
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 30 October 2008 14:52
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Thu, 30 October 2008 15:01
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 30 October 2008 15:04
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Thu, 30 October 2008 23:26
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 31 October 2008 01:42
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 07 November 2008 14:52
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Fri, 07 November 2008 17:09
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: captainc on Fri, 07 November 2008 23:46
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: Mindtraveller on Sat, 08 November 2008 02:17
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: kodos on Sun, 12 October 2008 19:38
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mirek on Sun, 12 October 2008 19:57
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: kodos on Sun, 12 October 2008 20:47
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: mr_ped on Thu, 30 October 2008 15:59
		Re: Has "file index" any fans? By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 30 October 2008 16:04

Previous Topic:	String == optimization hint...
Next Topic:	Macro thoughts

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Thu May 09 09:30:51 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01909 seconds