U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » Coffee corner » Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading [message #18657 is a reply to message #18643]

Wed, 15 October 2008 10:53

Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.

Experienced Contributor

mr_ped wrote on Tue, 14 October 2008 10:27

Is there some reason why this subset can't live along full mutex/etc. stuff in the same library?

The only reason I can think of is lure of mixing two approaches in one application. This would lead to many problems, just like mixing procedural (C) and object oriented (C++) approaches in one program.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 14 October 2008 01:10
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mr_ped on Tue, 14 October 2008 08:27
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 15 October 2008 10:53
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Wed, 15 October 2008 11:59
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: zsolt on Wed, 15 October 2008 21:49
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 15 October 2008 22:53
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: zsolt on Thu, 16 October 2008 11:38
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 16 October 2008 13:48
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Thu, 16 October 2008 15:04
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 14 November 2008 10:09
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Fri, 14 November 2008 10:15
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 17 November 2008 16:41
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 18 November 2008 00:53
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Tue, 18 November 2008 20:05
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 19 November 2008 01:45
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Wed, 19 November 2008 10:39
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 19 November 2008 13:20
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Wed, 19 November 2008 19:38
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 20 November 2008 10:19
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Thu, 20 November 2008 10:42
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 27 January 2009 00:06
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 03 July 2009 10:23
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Fri, 03 July 2009 18:49
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Sun, 05 July 2009 21:43
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Sun, 05 July 2009 22:08
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: Mindtraveller on Sat, 11 July 2009 16:06
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Sun, 12 July 2009 08:37
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mirek on Sun, 05 July 2009 22:10
		Re: Thoughts about alternative approach to multithreading By: mr_ped on Tue, 18 November 2008 09:05

Previous Topic:	subversion client recommendation
Next Topic:	Google Chrome Operative System

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 17 20:52:43 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02132 seconds