Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums
Members
Pages
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
Home
»
U++ Library support
»
U++ Libraries and TheIDE: i18n, Unicode and Internationalization
»
Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
Show:
Today's Messages
::
Show Polls
::
Message Navigator
E-mail to friend
Re: Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
[
message #20053
is a reply to
message #20046
]
Sat, 14 February 2009 01:47
Novo
Messages:
1358
Registered:
December 2006
Ultimate Contributor
luzr wrote on Fri, 13 February 2009 05:07
Novo wrote on Tue, 03 February 2009 17:21
It is possible to use _alloca() instead of fixed size stack buffer on Windows.
I believe it is not worth of trouble. These functions do not tend to be called in recursion and buffer sizes are adequate.
Mirek
It is just cleaner code and more efficient memory usage. You do not need such big buffer in most cases.
Regards,
Novo
Report message to a moderator
[
Message index
]
Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
By:
Novo
on Tue, 03 February 2009 23:21
Re: Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
By:
mirek
on Fri, 13 February 2009 11:07
Re: Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
By:
Novo
on Sat, 14 February 2009 01:47
Re: Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
By:
mirek
on Mon, 16 March 2009 10:25
Re: Improvements to several Lang.cpp functions
By:
Novo
on Tue, 17 March 2009 03:37
Previous Topic:
Basic character set analyzer
Next Topic:
Russian tr file for SVN 963
Goto Forum:
- Community
U++ community news and announcements
PR, media coverage, articles and documentation
U++ Webs: Functioning, Layout , Design, Features and Structure of these forums, homepage etc.
Coffee corner
Newbie corner
U++ based job offers
- Developing U++
U++ Developers corner
External resources
Releasing U++
UppHub
Bugs (& fixes)
Documentation
U++ TheIDE and Library: Releases and ChangeLogs
Mac OS
Android
- U++ Library support
U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere)
U++ Core
Look and Chameleon Technology
U++ Libraries and TheIDE: i18n, Unicode and Internationalization
U++ SQL
U++ MT-multithreading and servers
U++ Callbacks and Timers
U++ Widgets - General questions or Mixed problems
TopWindow&PopUp, TrayIcon
Menus&Toolbars
StatusBar&InfoCtrl
Splitter
TabCtrl
Slider&ProgressIndicator
ArrayCtrl, HeaderCtrl & GridCtrl
TreeCtrl
RichText,QTF,RTF...
LineEdit, EditFields, DocEdit
Draw, Display, Images, Bitmaps, Icons
FileSel&FileList, Path
CalendarCtrl
Skylark
ScatterDraw & ScatterCtrl
Archive
- U++ TheIDE
U++ TheIDE: Other Features Wishlist and/or Bugs
U++ TheIDE: Compiling, Linking, Debugging of your packages
U++ TheIDE: Installation, Compiling and Running of theide
U++ TheIDE: CodeEditor, Assist++, Topic++
U++ TheIDE: Packages
U++ TheIDE: Layout (Forms) Designer
U++ TheIDE: Icon designer
- Extra libraries, Code snippets, applications etc.
U++ users applications in progress and useful code snippets, including reference examples!
U++ Esc Interpreter, Esc Macros and templates
C++ language problems and code snippets
Applications created with U++
OS Problems etc., Win32, POSIX, MacOS, FreeBSD, X11 etc
-=]
Back to Top
[=-
[
Syndicate this forum (XML)
] [
] [
]
Current Time:
Thu May 16 17:08:08 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02645 seconds
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
It is just cleaner code and more efficient memory usage. You do not need such big buffer in most cases.
