U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere) » string[] causes many overload complaints

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: string[] causes many overload complaints [message #20227 is a reply to message #20226]

Mon, 02 March 2009 09:06

Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.

Experienced Contributor

Strange. Could you please explain how checking negative for unsigned int is better than using signed? As far as I understand, you check one bit? So what makes you think that (i == -1) is quicker than (i & 0x80000000)?

[Updated on: Mon, 02 March 2009 09:08]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		string[] causes many overload complaints By: aftershock on Sun, 01 March 2009 18:17
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: mirek on Mon, 02 March 2009 08:44
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: mr_ped on Mon, 02 March 2009 08:47
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 02 March 2009 09:06
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: mr_ped on Mon, 02 March 2009 10:15
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: mirek on Mon, 02 March 2009 16:40
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: aftershock on Mon, 02 March 2009 23:37
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: mirek on Tue, 03 March 2009 08:20
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: aftershock on Wed, 04 March 2009 12:07
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: Infausto on Wed, 04 March 2009 16:48
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: aftershock on Thu, 05 March 2009 12:09
		Re: string[] causes many overload complaints By: mr_ped on Thu, 05 March 2009 12:29

Previous Topic:	Linking problem with socket
Next Topic:	n-State Button

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue May 14 13:18:44 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01870 seconds