Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » 32 bit .deb releases
Re: 32 bit .deb releases [message #23932 is a reply to message #23931] Sat, 05 December 2009 19:31 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
andrei_natanael is currently offline  andrei_natanael
Messages: 262
Registered: January 2009
Experienced Member
dolik.rce wrote on Sat, 05 December 2009 20:13

koldo wrote on Sat, 05 December 2009 15:04

Hello Ion

I have tried them but without success.

Beginning with dosvn I get: 53: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "then"). I do not know script but the source does not seem to be wrong Sad

I have tried to run other scripts called from dosvn like idebuild and I get different errors.

Does anybody has tried them ?

Best regards
Koldo



Hi Koldo,

I've just tried to make a .deb using dosvn script without any problems. I even checked the source of the scripts and they do look OK. It's hard to believe that your bash is wrong, so the only reason I see that might cause this, is that the file is corrupted... But it's also possible that I'm missing something Smile

Regards,
Honza

PS: A loosely related sidenote: I tried to install the .deb I made and realized that it "requires" several packages I don't have installed (like libgtk2.0-dev). I was happily using upp for many months without it (using .NOGTK flag), so it's not really requirement. I suggest to make the package "recommend" it instead. Also g++ is not really needed to run theide...

Hello Honza,
We introduced gtk+ dependency because people expect to compile and run U++ examples unmodified(without flagNOGTK). g++ is not required to run theIDE but is a requirement to compile U++ examples and because the package doesn't install just theIDE executable but entire U++ framework, I think it's normal to provide g++ as a requirement and not as a recommended package else we have to split package in theIDE package and U++ development package and I think it's not what Mirek and others developers want and without a compiler what you'll do with theIDE?

Andrei
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Speller dictionaries...
Next Topic: .deb libnotify-dev warning!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 15 13:16:19 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01717 seconds