Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » Coffee corner » Qt and Android...
Re: Qt and Android... [message #28156 is a reply to message #28154] Thu, 19 August 2010 09:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
koldo is currently offline  koldo
Messages: 3360
Registered: August 2008
Senior Veteran
kohait00 wrote on Thu, 19 August 2010 09:18

btw: how to deal with multitouch?
android (or actually the hardware mostly) supports multitouch, but U++ is plain old point and click.. would such a behaviour be serialized to multiple invokations? maybe android supports to report only first occurance (filtering only one)

Hello Kohait

For sure U++ interface will change slightly after porting to Android.

After analising Android SDK and NDK you can propose new methods for U++ main classes like Ctrl that match with multitouch or other features specific to new mobile devices.

It would be great to see soon in U++ code things like:

#ifdef ANDROID



Best regards
IƱaki
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Number of U++ Developers/Users?
Next Topic: About freelance..
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 07 07:58:09 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02922 seconds