U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) [message #29898 is a reply to message #29896]

Sun, 28 November 2010 12:21

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

koldo wrote on Sun, 28 November 2010 03:51

Hello Mirek

So Rainbow package would be like Painter, but to be used in a web server to send Javascript to the client?. Would it include controls too?

No.

Actually, anything web related is "to be decided later".

What I want to do as "Project Rainbow" is CtrlCore host platform separation. That is a good prerequisite for framebuffer, SDL, MacOS X, Android and maybe "web terminal".

The important thing is that after the separation, all these technologies could be developed without edits to CtrlCore...

In other words, it will be possible to work on all these projects simultanously.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Fri, 02 July 2010 10:19
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 02 July 2010 16:24
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Fri, 02 July 2010 16:53
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 09:15
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:13
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:19
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Thu, 18 November 2010 11:23
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 18:21
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: dolik.rce on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:00
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 27 November 2010 19:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: koldo on Sun, 28 November 2010 09:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:21
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: unodgs on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:27
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sun, 28 November 2010 12:51
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:11
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: zsolt on Fri, 17 December 2010 12:16
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Sat, 18 December 2010 09:37
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 16:28
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: chickenk on Tue, 05 July 2011 18:14
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: kohait00 on Tue, 05 July 2011 19:20
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mr_ped on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:32
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 10:50
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: Tom1 on Mon, 29 November 2010 12:56
		Re: Porting Upp to SDL first ? (cause of MacOSX & framebuffer) By: mirek on Mon, 29 November 2010 19:08

Previous Topic:	U++ video control to come soon
Next Topic:	Rainbow Framebuffer - theide running

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue May 07 03:05:45 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03304 seconds