U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NTL and C4251

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: NTL and C4251 [message #2755 is a reply to message #2753]

Mon, 24 April 2006 16:04

jmansion is currently offline

jmansion
Messages: 15
Registered: April 2006
Location: London

Promising Member

>TheIDE has specific hacks to compile process that makes those
>ugly declspec issues for importing/exporting stuff unnecessary
>(EXPORTS are automatically generated, just like in linux/.so -
>no explicit export/import declarations are necessary).

Oh - I'd hardly call the situation on Linux ideal, hence the work the gcc team has been doing to make control of visibility much easier and the performance issues seen in OOo and KDE.

>Anyway, to tell the truth, U++ is designed to provide
>standalone executables, no .dlls at all.

Ouch. That's really a big disadvantage - it cuts out the use of SWIG to help automate subsystem testing etc or to provide services to JNI, P/Invoke or even to dynamically load extensions. I know I've typically released monolithic in-house binaries built static, but I'd not want to be forced to do this.

I'll just have to look at NTL and uSTL more closely, I guess. And that's probably answered whether I could move to U++ as my main development env. Still handy for its target GUI apps though I guess.

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 14:26
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:26
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:34
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:29
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 21:29
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:44
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:49
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:23
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:45
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 13:54
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:07
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:20
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:33
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:03
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:19
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:43
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 16:06
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:02
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:10
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:17
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:04
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:27
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: gprentice on Tue, 25 April 2006 06:41
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:45
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: gprentice on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:24
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:41
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:26

Previous Topic:	TimeDate.cpp [BUG][FIXED]
Next Topic:	Array container does only serialize base classes

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Fri May 10 13:54:47 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02772 seconds