U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NTL and C4251

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: NTL and C4251 [message #2775 is a reply to message #2771]

Tue, 25 April 2006 10:24

gprentice is currently offline

gprentice
Messages: 260
Registered: November 2005
Location: New Zealand

Experienced Member

luzr wrote on Tue, 25 April 2006 19:45

Actually, thinking about the issue, the real important limitation is that you cannot use U++/C++ interfaces at .dll levels except slightly experimental SO mode. Example would be U++ application with U++ plugins - in practice, while both using U++, each should contain it own copy of the library and comunicate using some C based interface.

Which makes quite a sense to me - C++ interfaces across dll modules are always problematic. Think compiler name mangling differences or object layout problems....

Mirek

But if the plugin and executable used the same compiler and build options etc. it probably work wouldn't it? - at least with VC++ on Windows? Getting the plugin to match the executable would be a problem though as you say.

Would event dispatch work with the dll plugin?? - would the dll need its own thread with an event loop if the plugin had a visual component?

Would the dll need a different version of GUI_APP_MAIN ?

Graeme

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 14:26
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:26
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:34
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:29
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 21:29
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:44
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:49
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:23
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:45
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 13:54
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:07
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:20
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:33
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:03
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:19
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:43
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 16:06
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:02
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:10
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:17
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:04
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:27
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: gprentice on Tue, 25 April 2006 06:41
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:45
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: gprentice on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:24
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:41
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:26

Previous Topic:	TimeDate.cpp [BUG][FIXED]
Next Topic:	Array container does only serialize base classes

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Fri May 10 06:24:58 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02664 seconds