Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NTL and C4251
Re: NTL and C4251 [message #2777 is a reply to message #2775] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 10:41 |
|
mirek
Messages: 13976 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
Quote: |
But if the plugin and executable used the same compiler and build options etc. it probably work wouldn't it? - at least with VC++ on Windows?
|
Quite a lot of variables.... (add "VC++ the same version"). However, it would work - that is the SO mode Well, the important thing there is that there are no explicit exports anywhere in U++ code (as mentioned before).
Quote: |
Would event dispatch work with the dll plugin?? - would the dll need its own thread with an event loop if the plugin had a visual component?
|
All I can say is that it works with U++ based OLE controls .dll used from MFC application. There were things to fix due to crazy MFC design, but it works.
Quote: |
Would the dll need a different version of GUI_APP_MAIN ?
|
Yes, most likely yes. However, you are not required to use GUI_APP_MAIN, that is more or less a fix to save you platform specific #ifdefs.
BTW, I may agree with "main hijacking" complaints about those APP_MAIN. However, after writing that platform specific initialization for 20th time (in examples), I simply got bored and lazy...
Mirek
|
|
|
|
|
NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 14:26
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:26
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:34
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:29
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 21:29
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:44
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:49
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:23
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:45
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 13:54
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:07
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:20
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:33
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:03
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:19
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:43
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 16:06
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:02
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:10
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:17
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:04
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:27
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:45
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:41
|
|
|
Re: NTL and C4251
By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:26
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 10 03:58:13 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02694 seconds
|