Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NTL and C4251
Re: NTL and C4251 [message #2816 is a reply to message #2799] Wed, 26 April 2006 10:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jmansion is currently offline  jmansion
Messages: 15
Registered: April 2006
Location: London
Promising Member
> Couriously, I always thought that the only
> problem of my hand-written parsers is somewhat
> worse perfomance compared to generated ones

Parser or scanner?

Anyway - are you using recursive descent throughout? (Sorry, haven't looked at CParser yet).

I seem to remember that when we wrote the Acorn BBC Micro C compiler, it got a big boost when the expression parser was moved from a recursive descent routine to a precedence engine.

But you'd have to ask Dave Christensen because that was a very long time ago, and I think he wrote that bit.

Anyway - its probably not worth worrying about this, 'cos I doubt that anyone has stomach for an implementation now. And I'd rather you guys wrote the MacOS port and integrated a real web widget and spreadsheet anyway. Smile
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: TimeDate.cpp [BUG][FIXED]
Next Topic: Array container does only serialize base classes
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri May 10 09:38:50 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02763 seconds