U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Considering different approach to Win32 release

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release [message #45265 is a reply to message #45264]

Mon, 26 October 2015 12:23

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Tom1 wrote on Mon, 26 October 2015 09:51

Hi Mirek,

I'm having trouble getting started with this new portable version:

First, unpacking the 7z file takes quite a long time because of mingw is there. (How about a non-mingw variant of Upp? I think I will never use mingw anyway.)

Second, U++ can not find my installed MSC9 and MSC10 SDK compilers (32 nor 64 bit variants). Selecting Setup>Instant setup.. does not help.

Third, I tried compiling UWord with both MINGW32 and MINGW64. Both work in DEBUG mode, but when compiled in Optimal mode, both UWord executables crash on start.

Can you help with these? Edit: I mean especially with getting MSC9 and MSC10 back to work. Dropping MINGW would be a nice option extra...

Best regards,

Tom

Thanks for testing and comments.

Instant setup indeed ignores pre MSC15 compilers. The primary reason is simple: VS 2015 is the first real Win32 C++11 compiler. As we would eventually like to move to C++11, I have decided to force this upon poor users a bit Smile

Smile

However, current U++ still supports MSC9 etc, including autosetup: It is hidden behind "Verbose" flag. Activate Verbose you will get legacy autosetup in Setup menu.

Thanks for archive size comment. I seemed OK to me, but this is perhaps the sign that more work is needed there... I guess I can significantly reduce the size, there is a lot of unused stuff there.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 19:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Sun, 20 September 2015 20:31
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Didier on Sun, 20 September 2015 21:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Sun, 20 September 2015 23:36
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: dolik.rce on Mon, 21 September 2015 07:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: timsky on Mon, 21 September 2015 15:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: koldo on Mon, 21 September 2015 16:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 21 October 2015 20:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 09:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 12:23
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:00
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 11:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:25
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 12:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Wed, 28 October 2015 08:06
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 10:53
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 11:32
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 October 2015 16:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 19:20
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:30
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:43
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 09:42
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 13:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:22
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 14:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:04
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:26
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 15:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 16:46
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Thu, 29 October 2015 18:18
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Thu, 29 October 2015 20:16
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Fri, 30 October 2015 10:13
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 12:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 14:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:05
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Fri, 30 October 2015 17:51
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:17
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 02 November 2015 17:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Mon, 26 October 2015 15:34
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Mon, 26 October 2015 18:58
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 27 October 2015 09:01
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:29
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:45
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:55
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 28 October 2015 07:57
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: cbpporter on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:39
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 27 October 2015 10:59
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Mon, 02 November 2015 18:10
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:27
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:48
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: Tom1 on Tue, 03 November 2015 11:33
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Wed, 25 November 2015 13:14
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mirek on Tue, 03 November 2015 09:52
		Re: Considering different approach to Win32 release By: mdelfede on Thu, 26 November 2015 09:35

Previous Topic:	mingw/gdb troubles
Next Topic:	Ideas on U++ as library

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun May 05 06:42:28 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02761 seconds