Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ TheIDE » U++ TheIDE: CodeEditor, Assist++, Topic++ » A small issue with CodeEditor
Re: A small issue with CodeEditor [message #46067 is a reply to message #46066] Sat, 27 February 2016 20:53 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Klugier is currently offline  Klugier
Messages: 1076
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków
Senior Contributor
Hello cbpporter,

OK. Breakpoint can stay as it is, but we should have option to disable it. I think for app that only allows editing code this function is not necessary. So we should introduce function like "DebugerInterface(bool b);". What do you think?

Quote:

Aren't annotations off until you add them?

Right, annotations size is set by default to zero (look at EditorBar constructor). If you want to enable it you will probably need to use following method of EditorBar (CodeEditor/EditorBar.cpp):
void EditorBar::Annotations(int width)
{
	annotations = width;
	SyncSize();
}


Quote:

Right now I'm working on a mini code outline, like in Sublime text on the right in the image: http://www.tecmint.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Sublime-Te xt-3.png

I wish we have separate code editor app outside TheIDE - maybe "U++ Edit" Smile. Please notice that U++ code editor is super fast. In my opinion it works better than other tools like notepad++.

Sincerely,
Klugier


U++ - one framework to rule them all.

[Updated on: Sat, 27 February 2016 20:54]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [FIXED] the menu Assist/THISBACKs.. (Alt + T) does not work
Next Topic: Crash TheIde when #include line is empty
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 26 01:19:32 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.03818 seconds