|
|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
| Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #46709 is a reply to message #46708] |
Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30   |
 |
Klugier
Messages: 1076
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków
|
Senior Contributor |
|
|
Hello kov_serg,
Quote:
My opinios transition into C++11 is a big strategic mistake. Until there is no modules there is no worthwhile reason to use it.
New features will couse even more problems in furute. Also it ruins backward compatibility with old machines. Old versions works even on i486 with windows95 and old suse distros.
I think transient to C++11/C++14 is the only way to keep upp competitive to other C++ frameworks. Keeping old standard only for backwards compatibility is not an option for future of U++. Please notice that several features that is available in newer standards like auto and lambdas allows us to develop U++ faster and easier. It is also good value for framework users code.
Moreover, sometimes ago Mirek created branch uppclassic that contains code that is compatibility with old standard. I think we should add this in our documentation - where find old sources. Mirek can you give us path to this branch - I cannot find it on github?
Quote:
For new computers there are a lot of better tools.
Can you specific what kind of competitors do you mean? Now days, we have got still many features to offer them.
Backing to prebuilds on Ubuntu - probably dolik.rc knows the problem. The issue was mention in another topic.
Sincerely,
Klugier
U++ - one framework to rule them all.
[Updated on: Sat, 16 July 2016 21:33] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
 |
|
What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Novo on Sat, 16 July 2016 17:04 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:37 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Thu, 21 July 2016 07:22 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: kov_serg on Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Fri, 02 September 2016 09:24 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 September 2016 09:04 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Wed, 17 August 2016 10:09 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:29 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:34 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19 |
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 17:05:14 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02672 seconds
|
|
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
